Poll
Question: Do you believe (a) God exists?
Yes - 5 (45.5%)
No - 2 (18.2%)
Undecided (/ 'I don't know') - 2 (18.2%)
I believe in multiple gods - 2 (18.2%)
Total Voters: 1

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13
Print
Author Topic: the big G  (Read 18973 times)
Scott
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 252




View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #105 on: October 05, 2008, 11:45:58 PM »




Quote
I was raised with the belief that Catholics were going to Hell; however, I have found more than one Catholic whose beliefs were very similar to my own. I think the key here is that there are still some Catholics who want to save themselves (putting themselves in Jesus's place=idolatry) or who pray to saints (idolatry). I hurt for you, because your wanting to save yourself qualifies as idolatry, at least in my eyes, and I'm scared for your soul. But regardless of where you're going in the long run, I'm glad to have you as a friend in the here and now.

that begs the question, then: why do people get/want to get saved?
what is the point of being saved if not for the eternal reward or for ethical reasons?

i can't really think of anything that would suggest an absolute lack - an entire, 100% complete lack - of selfishness, because being 100% selfless is theoretically impossible.
e.g the hug thing:  a person who hates giving hugs might appear to be doing an entirely selfless act by giving a hug to someone dear to them, but what is the motivation?  that person wants to see their friend (/relative, etc) to feel better, and that is still selfish to a degree (even if a very small one).

this is something i'd really like to see some answers to. (=


and i am glad to have you as a friend, as well.  Cheesy  even if i will burn for all eternity Wink


Quote
What I don't get is why a loving God would allow so many billions of His children to burn in hell for all eternity, even going so far as allowing demons to lead them down the wrong path. Sounds like a God who doesn't put much effort in helping His own. Basically, a person is expected to know the right choice. Making the wrong one means eternal torture. And there's nothing to inform one of how to make this choice other than what they are told by people. This is what I have so much trouble with.

i second that - emphatically!
and the matter of free will is one thing, as i think questioning is truly human nature (which God has to realise, or why would he have had jesus experience humanity?*) but allowing something so persuasive as demons to pull a person away from the lord seems cruel to me.  it's unnecessary and adds a strong bias against the christian path, and i can't understand why god wouldn't eliminate such a strong case against him if he wants us all to find him.
to me, that's like a horrid game.

Here is where Christians would say "we do not and can not know His will. we don't have the capacity and He has his reasons." I know, because I used to say that very thing. But here's the problem with that:

If the entire premise for our being here is to come to love God by virtue of our own free will, doesn't God's omniscience get in the way of that? God (being all-knowing) knows the beginning, the end and everything in between. God knew you before you were conceived. God knows how many hairs you have on your head at any given moment. God knows when you'll die, how you'll die and where you'll end up.

And again, if the premise for our being here is to come to love God by virtue of our own free will, wouldn't that mean God would have endowed us with the capacity of a true sense of logic in order to complete that task? If that logic tells us that, in order for God to be omniscient, He would have to know every minute detail about the universe regardless of time, doesn't that same logic tell you that running the experiment would be absolutely pointless?

For instance, I can predict with absolute certainty that I will type a '1' at the end of this line: 1

I did it, but I didn't have to in order to know what would happen. I'm not God but our "god-given" logic leads me to that very conclusion.

So why would an omniscient God carry out an experiment at all? He would not.

So unless God is lying about the reasoning (that we would love Him of our own free will), the false logic would also lead me to the conclusion that the Christian God doesn't make sense and therefore, doesn't exist.

Quote

*and why would he need to if he sees/knows all and is everywhere?

putting it in context: say mike and i haven't met in person, though he has heard some friends talking about me - some of whom think i'm wonderful, others who feel quite the opposite, some who didn't know i existed at all.  none of them have met me; it's all based on what they've heard, which in turn is based on what -they've- heard, which is...really just an endless chain of no direct contact and passed-on assumptions.  he doesn't know when he might meet me, if ever; he's just supposed to go with what he's been told by those closest to him.

his friends throw michael into a room full of single, attractive, women - one or a few of whom seem totally right for him - even though i know i am the only true, correct one for him and the 'pro-tara' friends of his know i am the only true, correct one for him (as the christian god knows he is correct).

in this instance then, a few questions arise:
why would/should he wait for me if i might never show myself?
why would/should he pass over the possibility of complete happiness and fulfillment with a girl that seems to be the one for him if the one he's told is 'true' is absent from his life?
why would/should he trust his friends if they can't even agree on whether i'm right for him or not?
why would/should he not dismiss the whole thing as being a cruel joke?


i know it's sort of a dodgy scenario, but i'm trying to put some perspective on it.
and scott, i know it's just another form of human projection; however, a god that creates and then burns eternally billions of His children (as TS said) sounds like a naughty kid by an ant hill with a magnifying glass.


Yes, I've heard the analogy that most of the monotheistic gods, once described, sound like children. That comes with the territory, I think.
Logged

"The important thing is not to stop questioning; curiosity has its own reason for existing." -- Albert Einstein
The Sleeper
Jr. Member
**

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 76



Directive?


View Profile Email
« Reply #106 on: October 06, 2008, 12:53:32 PM »



Here is where Christians would say "we do not and can not know His will. we don't have the capacity and He has his reasons." I know, because I used to say that very thing. But here's the problem with that:

If the entire premise for our being here is to come to love God by virtue of our own free will, doesn't God's omniscience get in the way of that? God (being all-knowing) knows the beginning, the end and everything in between. God knew you before you were conceived. God knows how many hairs you have on your head at any given moment. God knows when you'll die, how you'll die and where you'll end up.

And again, if the premise for our being here is to come to love God by virtue of our own free will, wouldn't that mean God would have endowed us with the capacity of a true sense of logic in order to complete that task? If that logic tells us that, in order for God to be omniscient, He would have to know every minute detail about the universe regardless of time, doesn't that same logic tell you that running the experiment would be absolutely pointless?

For instance, I can predict with absolute certainty that I will type a '1' at the end of this line: 1

I did it, but I didn't have to in order to know what would happen. I'm not God but our "god-given" logic leads me to that very conclusion.

So why would an omniscient God carry out an experiment at all? He would not.

So unless God is lying about the reasoning (that we would love Him of our own free will), the false logic would also lead me to the conclusion that the Christian God doesn't make sense and therefore, doesn't exist.

Furthermore, God is supposed to be perfect. Yet, God is shown to be angry and jealous at times. Aren't anger and jealousy human flaws? Doesn't the bible itself discourage us from anger, vengeance, and jealousy? Why, then, would God have these very faults? I really don't understand that. If God is perfect, then why would God even have emotions? Is every emotion that exists an emotion that God is capable of experiencing? God hates sin, right? Isn't hate a flaw? God seeks revenge, right? Isn't it wrong to seek revenge? God is angry, right? Isn't it wrong to show wrath? God is jealous, right? But doesn't jealousy violate one of the ten commandments?
This bothers me.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2008, 01:13:51 PM by pyroclasticlux » Logged

Okay, woke to a grocery list...
Goes like this:
Duty and death.
-Aesop Rock
Scott
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 252




View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #107 on: October 06, 2008, 07:54:49 PM »



Here is where Christians would say "we do not and can not know His will. we don't have the capacity and He has his reasons." I know, because I used to say that very thing. But here's the problem with that:

If the entire premise for our being here is to come to love God by virtue of our own free will, doesn't God's omniscience get in the way of that? God (being all-knowing) knows the beginning, the end and everything in between. God knew you before you were conceived. God knows how many hairs you have on your head at any given moment. God knows when you'll die, how you'll die and where you'll end up.

And again, if the premise for our being here is to come to love God by virtue of our own free will, wouldn't that mean God would have endowed us with the capacity of a true sense of logic in order to complete that task? If that logic tells us that, in order for God to be omniscient, He would have to know every minute detail about the universe regardless of time, doesn't that same logic tell you that running the experiment would be absolutely pointless?

For instance, I can predict with absolute certainty that I will type a '1' at the end of this line: 1

I did it, but I didn't have to in order to know what would happen. I'm not God but our "god-given" logic leads me to that very conclusion.

So why would an omniscient God carry out an experiment at all? He would not.

So unless God is lying about the reasoning (that we would love Him of our own free will), the false logic would also lead me to the conclusion that the Christian God doesn't make sense and therefore, doesn't exist.

Furthermore, God is supposed to be perfect. Yet, God is shown to be angry and jealous at times. Aren't anger and jealousy human flaws? Doesn't the bible itself discourage us from anger, vengeance, and jealousy? Why, then, would God have these very faults? I really don't understand that. If God is perfect, then why would God even have emotions? Is every emotion that exists an emotion that God is capable of experiencing? God hates sin, right? Isn't hate a flaw? God seeks revenge, right? Isn't it wrong to seek revenge? God is angry, right? Isn't it wrong to show wrath? God is jealous, right? But doesn't jealousy violate one of the ten commandments?
This bothers me.

I don't know that it's a sin to be angry. Jesus got angry when he saw merchants doing business in the temple and he knocked over their tables.

As for the rest, I think this article sums it up nicely-

http://www.christian-thinktank.com/madgod.html
Logged

"The important thing is not to stop questioning; curiosity has its own reason for existing." -- Albert Einstein
melidere
Full Member
***

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 125



Soli Deo Gloria


View Profile WWW
« Reply #108 on: October 07, 2008, 05:35:18 AM »

Furthermore, God is supposed to be perfect. Yet, God is shown to be angry and jealous at times. Aren't anger and jealousy human flaws? Doesn't the bible itself discourage us from anger, vengeance, and jealousy? Why, then, would God have these very faults? I really don't understand that. If God is perfect, then why would God even have emotions? Is every emotion that exists an emotion that God is capable of experiencing? God hates sin, right? Isn't hate a flaw? God seeks revenge, right? Isn't it wrong to seek revenge? God is angry, right? Isn't it wrong to show wrath? God is jealous, right? But doesn't jealousy violate one of the ten commandments?
This bothers me.

Imagine one of your Sunday school girls was raped and could name the perpetrator. Would it be wrong for you to be angry at the villain? No, this is righteous anger. Would it be wrong for you act on this anger? Yes, because you don't have the authority to do that. Would it be wrong for a judge to take revenge on behalf of this girl? No, it would be wrong if he didn't act on the girl's behalf.
Which of the ten commandments does jealousy violate? I think you're thinking of coveting. Jealousy is being intolerant of rivalry or unfaithfulness, being vigilant in guarding a possession. Coveting is being envious of something that belongs to someone else, being discontent with what you already have. God is not covetous (probably because everything already belongs to him!).
Logged
melidere
Full Member
***

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 125



Soli Deo Gloria


View Profile WWW
« Reply #109 on: October 07, 2008, 01:22:50 PM »

I was raised with the belief that Catholics were going to Hell; however, I have found more than one Catholic whose beliefs were very similar to my own. I think the key here is that there are still some Catholics who want to save themselves (putting themselves in Jesus's place=idolatry) or who pray to saints (idolatry).
There seems to be much confusion over what I assumed was a clear statement. By talking about Catholics who "idolatrize" Christianity by saving themselves, I meant those who spit on Christ's redemption and say, "Thank you very much, I can save myself through works without your help."
Logged
melidere
Full Member
***

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 125



Soli Deo Gloria


View Profile WWW
« Reply #110 on: October 07, 2008, 01:30:01 PM »

that begs the question, then: why do people get/want to get saved?
what is the point of being saved if not for the eternal reward or for ethical reasons?

I don't see any problem with being "selfish" about wanting the eternal reward--if you're humble enough to see that you can't make it there on your own, this is the natural thing to do. God doesn't require us to be 100% unselfish to let us into the kingdom; on the contrary, he requires us to admit we're altogether selfish even in the humanitarian efforts we put forth.
Logged
melidere
Full Member
***

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 125



Soli Deo Gloria


View Profile WWW
« Reply #111 on: October 07, 2008, 02:03:55 PM »

What I don't get is why a loving God would allow so many billions of His children to burn in hell for all eternity, even going so far as allowing demons to lead them down the wrong path. Sounds like a God who doesn't put much effort in helping His own. Basically, a person is expected to know the right choice. Making the wrong one means eternal torture. And there's nothing to inform one of how to make this choice other than what they are told by people. This is what I have so much trouble with.

i second that - emphatically!
and the matter of free will is one thing, as i think questioning is truly human nature (which God has to realise, or why would he have had jesus experience humanity?*) but allowing something so persuasive as demons to pull a person away from the lord seems cruel to me.  it's unnecessary and adds a strong bias against the christian path, and i can't understand why god wouldn't eliminate such a strong case against him if he wants us all to find him.
to me, that's like a horrid game.

*and why would he need to if he sees/knows all and is everywhere?
I believe God chooses not to know everything in order to preserve our free will. While he has the ability to know everything (all time lies before him, and he can enter any page at will), I believe he restricts himself to knowing just enough to keep the basic story line in the right direction, whereas Satan, the prince of this world, is intricately involved in the pursuit to undo God's plan. I think this accounts for why demonic influence is so prevalent and God seems to be absent. It does seem to be tipped in Satan's favor, but we have prayer and his Word, and good will eventually triumph over evil, no matter how hard Satan tries. And I believe that God chooses out those who are going to receive salvation and woos them in particular (Romans 9). He does look after his own--he just has a different view of who that is. Remember he's an artist--not all his creations are going to pique his interest.
Logged
Scott
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 252




View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #112 on: October 07, 2008, 02:11:24 PM »

Furthermore, God is supposed to be perfect. Yet, God is shown to be angry and jealous at times. Aren't anger and jealousy human flaws? Doesn't the bible itself discourage us from anger, vengeance, and jealousy? Why, then, would God have these very faults? I really don't understand that. If God is perfect, then why would God even have emotions? Is every emotion that exists an emotion that God is capable of experiencing? God hates sin, right? Isn't hate a flaw? God seeks revenge, right? Isn't it wrong to seek revenge? God is angry, right? Isn't it wrong to show wrath? God is jealous, right? But doesn't jealousy violate one of the ten commandments?
This bothers me.

Imagine one of your Sunday school girls was raped and could name the perpetrator. Would it be wrong for you to be angry at the villain? No, this is righteous anger. Would it be wrong for you act on this anger? Yes, because you don't have the authority to do that. Would it be wrong for a judge to take revenge on behalf of this girl? No, it would be wrong if he didn't act on the girl's behalf.

Although I agree with you mostly, I'd like to point out that just because it's "right" or "wrong" in our society does not mean the Christian God would think the same exact things were "right" and "wrong." Who says it's not wrong to take revenge on behalf of the girl? I think the Bible talks about avenging your father in the Old Testament but I don't know anything about avenging people you don't even know.

Quote
Which of the ten commandments does jealousy violate? I think you're thinking of coveting. Jealousy is being intolerant of rivalry or unfaithfulness, being vigilant in guarding a possession. Coveting is being envious of something that belongs to someone else, being discontent with what you already have. God is not covetous (probably because everything already belongs to him!).
Logged

"The important thing is not to stop questioning; curiosity has its own reason for existing." -- Albert Einstein
Scott
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 252




View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #113 on: October 07, 2008, 02:12:13 PM »

I was raised with the belief that Catholics were going to Hell; however, I have found more than one Catholic whose beliefs were very similar to my own. I think the key here is that there are still some Catholics who want to save themselves (putting themselves in Jesus's place=idolatry) or who pray to saints (idolatry).
There seems to be much confusion over what I assumed was a clear statement. By talking about Catholics who "idolatrize" Christianity by saving themselves, I meant those who spit on Christ's redemption and say, "Thank you very much, I can save myself through works without your help."

Is that what all Catholics believe or just some?
Logged

"The important thing is not to stop questioning; curiosity has its own reason for existing." -- Albert Einstein
Scott
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 252




View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #114 on: October 07, 2008, 02:14:47 PM »

that begs the question, then: why do people get/want to get saved?
what is the point of being saved if not for the eternal reward or for ethical reasons?

I don't see any problem with being "selfish" about wanting the eternal reward--if you're humble enough to see that you can't make it there on your own, this is the natural thing to do. God doesn't require us to be 100% unselfish to let us into the kingdom; on the contrary, he requires us to admit we're altogether selfish even in the humanitarian efforts we put forth.

The Bible says that God requires a 100% sin-free individual to 'let us into the kingdom.' That's supposed to be the exact reason he allowed Jesus to die to cover those sins. In essence, I'm agreeing with your statement, just not with the "selfish" part.
Logged

"The important thing is not to stop questioning; curiosity has its own reason for existing." -- Albert Einstein
Scott
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 252




View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #115 on: October 07, 2008, 02:16:22 PM »

Hey everyone: Just a quick note.

If you want to quote what someone else is saying, there is a button/link on the top right of someone's individual message that you can click to reply specifically to that person.

I noticed a few of you are using the color settings to differentiate your posts from your responses. Just thought I'd help you out.
Logged

"The important thing is not to stop questioning; curiosity has its own reason for existing." -- Albert Einstein
Scott
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 252




View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #116 on: October 07, 2008, 02:31:35 PM »

What I don't get is why a loving God would allow so many billions of His children to burn in hell for all eternity, even going so far as allowing demons to lead them down the wrong path. Sounds like a God who doesn't put much effort in helping His own. Basically, a person is expected to know the right choice. Making the wrong one means eternal torture. And there's nothing to inform one of how to make this choice other than what they are told by people. This is what I have so much trouble with.

i second that - emphatically!
and the matter of free will is one thing, as i think questioning is truly human nature (which God has to realise, or why would he have had jesus experience humanity?*) but allowing something so persuasive as demons to pull a person away from the lord seems cruel to me.  it's unnecessary and adds a strong bias against the christian path, and i can't understand why god wouldn't eliminate such a strong case against him if he wants us all to find him.
to me, that's like a horrid game.

*and why would he need to if he sees/knows all and is everywhere?

I believe God chooses not to know everything in order to preserve our free will.

I've never read where it says that. Where did you get that knowledge?

Quote
While he has the ability to know everything (all time lies before him, and he can enter any page at will), I believe he restricts himself to knowing just enough to keep the basic story line in the right direction, whereas Satan, the prince of this world, is intricately involved in the pursuit to undo God's plan. I think this accounts for why demonic influence is so prevalent and God seems to be absent. It does seem to be tipped in Satan's favor, but we have prayer and his Word, and good will eventually triumph over evil, no matter how hard Satan tries. And I believe that God chooses out those who are going to receive salvation and woos them in particular (Romans 9). He does look after his own--he just has a different view of who that is. Remember he's an artist--not all his creations are going to pique his interest.

Look, no offense but it seems like now you're just not playing fair. If you make the world fit the story, you're going about it the wrong way. The story should fit the world.

When Darwin came up with a theory to explain why there's evidence that species evolve over time from common ancestry, he didn't come up with the theory first and then try to make the world fit into it. He observed the world and came up with a possible explanation as to why things worked they way they work. And he was absolutely right. We've actually witnessed exactly what his theory predicted to be true.
Logged

"The important thing is not to stop questioning; curiosity has its own reason for existing." -- Albert Einstein
pyroclasticlux
pandora's chatterbox
Global Moderator
Full Member
*****

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 198



vek zhivi - vek uchis'!

refloexion
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #117 on: October 07, 2008, 03:26:16 PM »


Quote
Look, no offense but it seems like now you're just not playing fair. If you make the world fit the story, you're going about it the wrong way. The story should fit the world.

When Darwin came up with a theory to explain why there's evidence that species evolve over time from common ancestry, he didn't come up with the theory first and then try to make the world fit into it. He observed the world and came up with a possible explanation as to why things worked they way they work. And he was absolutely right. We've actually witnessed exactly what his theory predicted to be true.

there are still plenty of - surprise - theists that don't believe evolution exists.  this should make them understand why atheists & agnostics have so much trouble: they feel that 'proof' of God is everywhere, yet A&As can't 'see' it.
evolutionary proof is everywhere, yet so many of them choose to ignore it or simply don't see it.
perhaps this is a half-way point.


Quote
Hey everyone: Just a quick note.

If you want to quote what someone else is saying, there is a button/link on the top right of someone's individual message that you can click to reply specifically to that person.

actually, i know that's there but i hate using it because it makes the posts a LOT longer than necessary.  they're often hard to follow when there are many points made in the reference post yet there's a short response, because it's not always easy to figure out what exactly is being referenced.

this way is a lot shorter and cleaner, in my humble (hah) opinion.


and, finally,
Quote
And I believe that God chooses out those who are going to receive salvation and woos them in particular (Romans 9).  He does look after his own--he just has a different view of who that is. Remember he's an artist--not all his creations are going to pique his interest.

if god plays favourites, i'm obviously not on that list.  this angers me a great deal, though.
i would think God would care more about those who struggle with their beliefs and faith, if he's as fair and loving and all those other 'good' things we're supposed to believe.  why would he essentially favour those with more of a 'free ride' and abandon those of us who have difficulties?
for a god to focus on those that already are sold on him and simply take no interest in those who aren't, that certainly is quite appalling, really. 
that's like having a house full of kids and choosing to focus your attention on the ones that are sweetest and show the most love; the ones that are troubled apparently can just be ignored, or at least have less attention paid to them, because they're just going to end up losers and have no hope for their futures, anyway.
if that's how the christian god truly is, then i'm saddened to admit i want no part of christianity.

« Last Edit: October 07, 2008, 07:43:51 PM by pyroclasticlux » Logged

l'humour est culturel; le rire est universel
(=
pyroclasticlux
pandora's chatterbox
Global Moderator
Full Member
*****

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 198



vek zhivi - vek uchis'!

refloexion
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #118 on: October 07, 2008, 08:18:41 PM »



also,

Quote
By talking about Catholics who "idolatrize" Christianity by saving themselves, I meant those who spit on Christ's redemption and say, "Thank you very much, I can save myself through works without your help."
Quote
Is that what all Catholics believe or just some?

those in my family & mike's don't seem to subscribe to that way of thinking.  i thought part of catholicism was acknowledging jesus died for our sins & that we were indebted to him for that, but i've never personally dealt with any that hold such little regard for Jesus.
i'm curious where this comes from; if any of you have any examples for me, i'd be open to seeing them.

Logged

l'humour est culturel; le rire est universel
(=
The Sleeper
Jr. Member
**

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 76



Directive?


View Profile Email
« Reply #119 on: October 08, 2008, 12:56:04 PM »



also,

Quote
By talking about Catholics who "idolatrize" Christianity by saving themselves, I meant those who spit on Christ's redemption and say, "Thank you very much, I can save myself through works without your help."
Quote
Is that what all Catholics believe or just some?

those in my family & mike's don't seem to subscribe to that way of thinking.  i thought part of catholicism was acknowledging jesus died for our sins & that we were indebted to him for that, but i've never personally dealt with any that hold such little regard for Jesus.
i'm curious where this comes from; if any of you have any examples for me, i'd be open to seeing them.



www.chick.com
Smiley
Logged

Okay, woke to a grocery list...
Goes like this:
Duty and death.
-Aesop Rock
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13
Print
Jump to:  

eXTReMe Tracker